City Councillors Left High and Dry: Mayor Seeks Delay of Controversial Central Plains Water Report

I am outraged that Councillors have been left 'high and dry' in regards to receiving a Council Report into the controversial loan arrangements of the Central Plains Water Scheme.

Councillors were advised today by Tony Marryatt (Chief Executive of the Christchurch City Council) that a delay of the urgent report (requested by February 2008) into the controversial Central Plains Water Limited loan was sought by the Mayor until May because he was away and wishes to participate in the debate. This is despite the fact that the Mayor unsuccessfully voted to stop the report being written in the first place. It should be further noted that he was available in February when the report was originally due to come back.

I have previously welcomed the Christchurch City Council's decision to seek a report on options for an independent review of the issues surrounding the controversial Central Plains Water Limited loan from Dairy Holdings Limited.

The call for a report followed the Council's vote on December 13th 2007 to not accept the Central Plains Water Trust Annual Report or the City Council's staff report written to address concerns of the Malvern Hills Protection Society deputation on November 7th 2007.

I find it extraordinary that this matter has been able to be delayed when a majority of City Councillors have expressed such significant concern. This is an important and urgent issue for the people of Christchurch and delaying the report back to Council by three months (February to May) is simply outrageous and unacceptable.

As a Councillor I expect Council resolutions to be acted on in a timely fashion and not be deferred because of an overseas trip by the Mayor. This raises a scary precedent for the powers of a Mayor when he can override a decision made by the majority of Council. I will be writing to the Chief Executive expressing my concern and seeking the report that was due in February to be put on the next Council agenda for 24 April 2008.

The Central Plains Water Scheme is a hugely controversial project. Since my election to Council there have been numerous deputations made regarding concern at details of the DHL loan. I believe there are valid questions which need to be addressed. The biggest question is the potential for a private dairy company (Dairy Holdings Limited) to gain the rights to resource consents (if granted) for a scheme that was initially set up for the public good. I would be very concerned if the loan agreement in any way enabled the loss of resource consents from public ownership. The purpose of receiving the requested report was to get answers to fundamental questions that could threaten the very purpose of the Central Plains Water Scheme.


Supporting information: resolution from Council Meeting (December 20th, 2007)

That staff report to the February 2008 Council meeting on the options available to the Council, to conduct an independent review including a second legal opinion on the matters raised by the Malvern Hills Protection Society, addressing specifically the cost, timing, scope and implications of conducting such a review.

Lowering Voting Age a Good Call!

I think its great that Sue Bradford has raised the voting age debate. I've always believed its a good way to increase voter turnout by lowering the voting age to 16 years of age. It would also enable better education and participation of people in the political process. This is because it gives more opportunity to provide information and awareness through the school system that is relevant to young people. I believe that by reducing the age, people will form voting habits from an earlier age and hence be more likely to vote. This is consistent with the Christchurch City Council’s independent commissioned report into poor local body voter turnout that states “Habit, Duty, Right” as being the primary reason why people vote in local body elections.

Another positive in reducing the voting age is that there are many relevant local body issues for young people today- drag racing, lack of underage venues, safety, public transport and so on. But because young people cannot vote, their concerns and voices are often ignored or brushed aside. A voting age of 16 would make politicians more accountable to the needs of young people.

Hitting the Campaign Trail!

City Housing Tenants Get Bad Deal over Leafy Gutters

It would appear the City housing tenants are getting a bad deal. Their rents have gone up steadily over the past few years to increase maintenance and yet their streets are clearly not being cleaned or looked after properly.

I have been told there have been numerous complaints regarding the leafs in the gutters and yet nothing has been done. It is unacceptable that simply because they are city housing tenants they are getting a lower level of service for street cleaning.

The result of these gutters not being cleaned regularly is the drains are now filled with leaves and if it rains the streets will be subject to massive flooding.

I encourage City Housing tenants to continue to lodge complaints and will be seeking a report from the Council on what has led to the failure of the current arrangements so that it can be fixed in future.

Also it is worth noting that other residents in public streets should ring the main council number 941 8999 and lodge requests for service if they are having similar problems.